Legal Opinion
Artmark Chicago Ltd. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 23, 1977No. C.A.D. 1192; No. 76-32PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lane, Judge.-
This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court in Artmark Chicago, Ltd. v. United States, 76 Cust. Ct. 187, C.D. 4654, 417 F. Supp. 1030 (1976), overruling appellant’s (Artmark’s) protest against the classification of certain imported plastic horses. We affirm.
■ The -imported merchandise consists of plastic horse figures ap-; proximately ten inches high with removable plastic saddles and metal reins.’
*118The collector classified the horses under item 737.40 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), as modified by Presidential Proclamation 3822, T.D.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Klipstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- Kubie v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- The United States v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Western Stamping Corporation v. The United States (Louis Marx & Co., Inc., Party-In-Interest)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- S. Y. Rhee Importers v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- S. J. Stile Associates Ltd. v. SnyderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Air-Sea Brokers, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Cascade Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Kurt Orban Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.