Legal Opinion

Cascade Corp. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 22, 1979No. 78-17PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Market, Chief Judge.

Cascade Corp. (Cascade) appeals from the judgment of the U.S. Customs Court, 81 Cust. Ct. 9, C.D. 4757, 457 F. Supp. 1022 (1978), sustaining the government’s basis of appraisement (constructed value) of certain imported knuckleboom cranes. We affirm.

*44 Background

Cascade granted Toyo Umpanki Co., Ltd. (TCM), an exclusive license to manufacture and sell three models of patented knuckle-boom cranes in Japan, retaining the exclusive right to import those cranes into the United States.1 TCM paid royalties only on sales to persons other than Cascade. In addition, TCM promised to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wood v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  2. Artmark Chicago Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  3. Spanexico, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  4. D. H. Baldwin Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  5. Ernest Lowenstein, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API