Choi v. Sagemark Consulting
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtPremo, Acting P.J.
*312This civil action arises from the provision of allegedly negligent and fraudulent financial planning advice involving a program for investment in life insurance and annuities under former section 412(i) of the Internal Revenue Code (the "412(i) Plan"). Plaintiffs claim that defendants induced them to establish the 412(i) Plan by misrepresenting its promised benefits and marketing it as a "safe" investment, even though they knew, or should have known, that the plan was likely to invite Internal Revenue Service (IRS) scrutiny. Plaintiffs also claim that defendants failed to take prompt action…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moss v. Duncan, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Area 55 v. Nicholas & TomasevicCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Area 55 v. Nicholas & Tomasevic CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Berlanga v. University of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- California-American Water Co. v. Marina Coast Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.