Legal Opinion

Estate of Shepard

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1963No. Civ. 27056PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

Petitioners Laura Ott 1 and Doris Peters appeal from the judgment entered against them following a proceeding to determine heirship under sections 1080 et seq. of the Probate Code. It was therein determined that appellants were not the granddaughters and pretermitted heirs of Belle Shepard, deceased.

At the trial the evidence introduced by appellants was largely documentary, although the testimony of their aunt and uncle, if believed, would have tended to support their claims. The family history, as delineated by appellants, is both lengthy and complex; no useful purpose would be served by our…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Whitley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Broads v. Mead and CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Free v. FurrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Bramble v. McEwanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Siegal v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Estate of HormanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. In Re Marriage of LiuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Meskell v. Culver City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API