Legal Opinion
Meskell v. Culver City Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 16, 1970No. Civ. 35392PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRAMPTON, J. * —
Statement of the Case
Plaintiff, as prime contractor on the project, brought an action to recover damages against defendant Culver City Unified School District (hereinafter District) and defendant Flewelling & Moody (hereinafter Flewelling), the architect retained by the District, caused principally by an alleged misrepresentation in the plans and specifications as to the weight of certain concrete roof segments which failed during the course of construction of a school auditorium for the District, and an alleged change in the specifications requiring a more expensive…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Siegal v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Tabor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Free v. FurrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Desherow v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gulf Coast Asphalt Co. v. LloydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Dakota Payphone, LLC v. AlcarazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Copley Press, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Citicorp North America, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Tielsch v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.