State v. Crawford
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Defendant contends that his motion for judgment as of nonsuit, his motion for a new trial, or his motion to set aside the verdict should have been granted. He argues that there was “a fatal variance between allegations of ownership” of the' premises entered and of the property taken in the indictment and proof of ownership at trial. The bill of indictment charged the defendant with breaking or entering the premises and larceny of the property of “Mobile Home Brokers, Inc., a corporation.’’ At trial, John Yow testified that he travelled to Fayetteville .and identified some of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. EppleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. MabrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LitchfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. MelvinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. PropstCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015