Legal Opinion

State v. Reeves

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 1983No. 8215SC1049PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The defendant first argues that his motions to dismiss should have been granted. In passing on a motion to dismiss, it is the court’s duty to ascertain if there is substantial evidence of each essential element of the offense charged. State v. Hutchins, 303 N.C. 321, 344, 279 S.E. 2d 788, 803 (1981). “Substantial evidence” is defined as that amount of relevant evidence that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. State v. Fletcher, 301 N.C. 709, 712, 272 S.E. 2d 859, 860-61 (1981).

The evidence must be interpreted in the light most favorable to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. RinckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. RawlinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. QuickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API