Legal Opinion

State v. Propst

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 21, 2015No. COA15–59Published

1Opinion of the Court

INMAN, Judge.

Defendant appeals the judgments entered after a jury convicted him of felonious breaking or entering, felonious attempted larceny, possession of marijuana, and possession of drug paraphernalia and defendant pled guilty to attaining habitual felon status. On appeal, defendant contends that: (1) the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss the attempted larceny charge because there was insufficient proof of ownership; (2) the breaking or entering charge, which was predicated on defendant's intent to commit larceny, must be vacated because there was insufficient evidence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. EppleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Little v. National Service Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API