Jacks v. Deering
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion rendered upon the former appeal, 139 Cal. 507, and in the opinion of the court upon the present appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is the second appeal. The first appeal will be found reported in Jacks v. Estee, 139 Cal. 507, [73 Pac. 247], Mr. Estee having died, and Mr. Leering having been substituted as administrator in his place.
Some of the facts are set forth in the opinion above cited. Others will be noticed as may be necessary. Section 38 of the Civil Code provides: “A person entirely without under standing has no power to make a contract of any kind, but he is liable for the reasonable value of things furnished to him necessary for his support or for the support of his family.” Section 39 of the same code…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jacks v. EsteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by9 opinions
- Carr v. Sacramento Clay Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. EmmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Dool v. First Nat'l Bank of CalexicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Millsap v. BalfourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Burgess v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.