Legal Opinion

Millsap v. Balfour

California Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1910No. Sac. No. 1797PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment "foreclosing the lien of a street assessment made under the act commonly known as the “Vrooman Act,” (Stats. 1885, c. 153).

The work for which the assessment was levied was the laying of a concrete cement sidewalk five feet wide along the south side of Clover Street in the city of Woodland from Westcott Street to Walnut Street, a distance of six blocks, excepting the portions thereof where concrete cement sidewalks had already been constructed and accepted. Balfour owned a lot abutting Clover Street on the north side, fronting thereon for a distance of 186…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Flood v. TempletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Klauber v. San Diego Street Car Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Hibernia Sav. and Loan Soc. v. FarnhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Hammond v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. People v. Rath Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API