Legal Opinion
Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Riverton Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 5, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 65-4PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANNELLA, District Judge.
Motion by the plaintiff, pursuant to Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure1 to strike paragraphs 13 through 18 of defendant’s amended answer as insufficient in law, is denied.2
The case at bar 3 is a suit for infringement of United States Patent No. 2,724,720 against the defendant based upon its alleged manufacture and sale of a pharmaceutical compound useful as an anti-convulsant and possessing depressant properties in the central nervous system. The patent was issued to plaintiff upon the application of Frank M. Berger and Bernard J. Ludwig and plaintiff…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Karen Renee Augustus, a Minor, by Charles A. Augustus, Her Father, and Next Friend v. The Board of Public Instruction of Escambia County, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Salcer v. Envicon Equities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Anchor Hocking Corp. v. Jacksonville Electric AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1976
- Friends of Santa Fe County v. LAC Minerals, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1995
- Lane v. PageDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Smith, Kline & French Laboratories v. A. H. Robins Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.