United States v. Lopez
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WEINSTEIN, District Judge.
Defendant is charged with concealing and facilitating the transportation of heroin and of conspiring to commit that crime. 21 U.S.C. §§ 173, 174. He has moved to suppress heroin taken from his person.
Presented is the question of whether the anti-hijacking system used at our airports is constitutional. For the reasons indicated below, we hold the system valid. Nevertheless, because in this particular case the elegant and objective method devised by the government to deter and apprehend hijackers was distorted in an irrational and prejudicial way by airlines…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- People v. HintonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- United States v. Charles Davis AKA Marcus AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- George Karnes v. Thomas Skrutski, in His Individual Capacity Edward Kowalski, in His Individual CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Henry BellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.