Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Isenstead v. Watson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 13, 1957No. Civ. A. 307-56PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

This is an action against the Commissioner of Patents under 35 U.S.C. § 145, formerly Revised Statutes § 4915, to secure an adjudication that the plaintiff is entitled to a patent on an application that the Commissioner of Patents has rejected. The application relates to a medical compound for the purpose of testing the function of the human liver.

Although several claims were contained in the application, only Claim 2 is now being pressed. Claim 2 covers a composition of matter adapted to shift blood proteins, consisting of three different substances. The quantity of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Besser v. Merrilat Culvert Core Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Application of Carl Peter KrimmelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  2. Application of William L. Hartop, Jr., and Edward P. BrandesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. In re NovakCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  4. Application of Robert R. CitronCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  5. Application of William C. AnthonyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API