Legal Opinion

Ruggles v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1894No. 15682PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Application for a writ of prohibition to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.

Application for prohibition. Petitioner is the administrator of the estate of one Henry Welch, deceased, in course of administration in the department of said respondent superior court presided over by said Hon. J. V. Coffey, judge thereof. On February 16, 1894, an order was made and entered in said estate, directing petitioner, as such administrator, to pay to the widow of said deceased seven thousand three hundred and seventy-five dollars, as accrued and unpaid family allowance. From this order the administrator, on February 20, 1894, perfected an appeal to this court. Thereafter, the widow…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennie v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ex parte OrfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Van Dyke v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State v. District Court of Eighth Jud. Dist.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Vosburg v. VosburgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Dunston v. Los Angeles Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1913

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API