Legal Opinion

Ex parte Orford

California Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1894No. 21131PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Petition to the Supreme Court for release from imprisonment upon a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

The petitioner is administratrix of an estate in probate. As such she was ordered by the superior court, in which the administration was pending, to *657pay a claim allowed on account of expenses of the last illness of her intestate. From this order she took an appeal to this court. Notwithstanding her appeal she was cited by the superior court to show cause why she should not be punished for a contempt of its authority, in failing or refusing to pay said claim. After a hearing she was found guilty of the contempt charged, and sentenced to be imprisoned until she should make the payment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ruggles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API