Commonwealth v. Lloyd
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Per Curiam,
Appellant was convicted after a nonjury trial in Philadelphia on September 30, 1966 of felonious pos session and sale of narcotic drugs. The Superior Court affirmed appellant Lloyd’s conviction without opinion; a petition for allowance of appeal followed. This petition is granted, the Superior and trial courts are reversed and a new trial is granted.
The prosecution’s sole witness to the alleged “buy” of narcotics was LaForrest Russell, a Federal Bureau of Investigation undercover agent. Russell testified that he was introduced to appellant by an informer and that appellant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MarshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. RoebuckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. EnnisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
- Commonwealth v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. MickensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.