Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lloyd

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1967No. 152PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Appellant was convicted after a nonjury trial in Philadelphia on September 30, 1966 of felonious pos session and sale of narcotic drugs. The Superior Court affirmed appellant Lloyd’s conviction without opinion; a petition for allowance of appeal followed. This petition is granted, the Superior and trial courts are reversed and a new trial is granted.

The prosecution’s sole witness to the alleged “buy” of narcotics was LaForrest Russell, a Federal Bureau of Investigation undercover agent. Russell testified that he was introduced to appellant by an informer and that appellant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MarshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. RoebuckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. EnnisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. MickensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API