Williams Oil-O-Matic Heating Corporation v. Butler Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HATFIELD, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal, in a trade-mark cancellation proceeding, from the decision of the Commisssioner of Patents affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences dismissing appellant’s application for the cancellation of the registration of appellee’s trade-mark “Oilomatic” for use on windmills.
Appellant alleges in its application that it has used the word “Oil-O-Matic” as a trade-mark for liquid fuel-burning devices (oil burners) and safety-control means therefor, since August, 1921; that appellee’s trade-mark registration No. 219,976, “set up a date of adoption…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- New Orleans v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Nesbit v. Riverside Independent DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lavin v. PierottiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- Mantle Lamp Co. of America v. Aladdin Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- American Cyanamid Co. v. Synthetic Nitrogen Products Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- American Cyanamid Co. v. Synthetic Nitrogen Products Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- Lavin v. PierottiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942