Legal Opinion
American Cyanamid Co. v. Synthetic Nitrogen Products Corp.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 31, 1932No. Patent Appeal 2986PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.
The appellant, American Cyanamid Company, on May 29, 1928, procured the registration of a trade-mark in the United States Patent Office, on an application filed January 6, 1928. This trade-mark _ consisted of the word “Ammo-Phos-Ko,” arranged in a curve, with a representation of a human hand grasping “flashes of lightning” immediately thereunder, and was used on mixed fertilizer.
The appellee filed petition for cancellation, claiming use of the trade-mark “Nitrophoska” at the time of filing the petition and for a period long prior to December 7, 1927, on mixed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Model Brassiere Co. v. Bromley-Shepard Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. Compo Shoe MacHinery Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- Celanese Corporation of America v. Vanity Fair Silk MillsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Apex Electrical Mfg. Co. v. Landers, Frary & ClarkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Celotex Co. v. MillingtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Proctor & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- United-Carr Fastener Corp. v. Capewell Mfg. Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Vick Chemical Co. v. Thomas Kerfoot & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- American Brewing Co. v. Delatour Beverage Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
- American Lava Corp. v. Multronics, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.