Legal Opinion

American Cyanamid Co. v. Synthetic Nitrogen Products Corp.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 31, 1932No. Patent Appeal 2986Published

1Opinion of the Court

58 F.2d 834 (1932)

AMERICAN CYANAMID CO.

v.

SYNTHETIC NITROGEN PRODUCTS CORPORATION.

Patent Appeal No. 2986.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

May 31, 1932.

H. C. Bierman, of New York City, for appellant.

Charles H. Potter and James F. Pierce, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.

The appellant, American Cyanamid Company, on May 29, 1928, procured the registration of a trade-mark in the United States Patent Office, on an application filed January 6, 1928. This trade-mark consisted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Model Brassiere Co. v. Bromley-Shepard Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  2. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. Compo Shoe MacHinery Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  3. Celanese Corporation of America v. Vanity Fair Silk MillsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  4. Apex Electrical Mfg. Co. v. Landers, Frary & ClarkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  5. Celotex Co. v. MillingtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API