Legal Opinion
In re Herschler
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 1, 1979No. Appeal No. 78-548PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) affirming the rejection of claims 1-5 and 9-13 in appellant’s application serial No. 304,283,1 filed November 6, *6951972, for “Enhancing Tissue Penetration of Physiologically Active Steroidal Agents with DMSO.”2
The board affirmed the examiner’s rejection of all claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Lubowe in view of Faust, Marson or Brown. The board also affirmed a rejection, first entered pursuant to its authority under 37 C.F.R. § 1.196(b),3 of each of the claims…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumuller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BanderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- In re WertheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- In re SmytheCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Application of Carl A. Lukach, Setha G. Olson and Harold M. SpurlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- In re SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- University of Rochester v. G.D. Searle & Co., Inc., Monsanto Company, Pharmacia Corporation, and Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- In Re Walter Kaslow and Uniform Product Code Council, Inc. (Uppc), IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Boston Scientific Corp. v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Max Daetwyler Corp. v. Input Graphics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.