Legal Opinion
Denlinger v. CHINADOTCOM CORP.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 30, 2003No. H024577PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, P. J.
Does article 10(a) of The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters (the Convention) allow service of process by mail? We conclude that it does. We therefore reverse the trial court’s order granting respondents’ motion to quash the service of summons and complaint of plaintiff and appellant Paul Denlinger.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Respondents Peter Hamilton, Peter YIP Hak Yung, and Raymond Ch’ien are directors and officers of Chinadotcom, a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands with offices in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Zicherman Ex Rel. Estate of Kole v. Korean Air Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. Roussel Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Research Systems Corporation v. Ipsos Publicite, Ipsos Usa, IpsosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Bankston v. Toyota Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Standard Microsystems Corp. v. Winbond Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- In Re Jennifer O.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Landstar Global Logistics, Inc. v. Robinson & Robinson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Whyenlee Indus. Ltd. v. Superior Court of San Mateo Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Martin O.California Court of Appeal · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.