Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Hayes
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO TRANSFER
DONALD, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the motions of Defendants, Paul J. Hayes; Weingarten, Schurgin, Gagnebin, & Lebo-vici, LLP (“Weingarten”); and Mintz, Lev-in, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. (“Mintz”), to dismiss, stay or transfer. For the following reasons, this Court grants Defendants’ motions to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Massachusetts.
The general rule applicable when duplicative lawsuits are pending in separate federal courts is “that the entire action…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moses v. Business Card Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Plating Resources, Inc. v. UTI Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
- Daimler-Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
- Plough, Inc. v. Allergan, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fuller v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2005
- Swift v. BancorpSouth, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
- Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. GPNE CORP.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
- Ellipsis, Inc. v. Colorworks, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2004
- Buff City Soap LLC v. BynumDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022