Legal Opinion
Plough, Inc. v. Allergan, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided June 12, 1990No. 90-2272-4BPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING ALLERGAN’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO STAY OR TRANSFER
McRAE, Senior District Judge.
The present case is a declaratory judgment action brought by plaintiff Plough, Inc. (“Plough”) against Allergan, Inc. and its subsidiary Herbert Laboratories (collectively referred to herein as “Allergan”) pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201. The complaint seeks a judgment declaring that Plough has not violated Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and an order prohibiting Allergan from continuing to harass Plough. Allergan has moved to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company, a Michigan and Indiana Corporation v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- William Gluckin & Co., Inc. v. International Playtex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Nicol v. Koscinski, U.S. Dist. JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Amsouth Bank (03-5517) First Tennessee Bank (03-5521) v. George DaleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- In Re GurleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1997
- Kmart Corp. v. Key Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
- Daimler-Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
- Thomas & Betts Corp. v. HayesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.