Legal Opinion
Washington, Marlboro & Annapolis Motor Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 17, 1952No. Civ. A. No. 2831-49PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
Nature of the Case
In this appeal the Court is asked to suspend and vacate two orders, namely No. 3530 and No. 3715 of the Public Utilities Commission of the District of Columbia, hereinafter referred to as the ■ Commission, which were issued as a result of proceedings before the Commission denominated “In the Matter of Bus Service of the Capital Transit Company in Southeast Washington and designated as P.U.C. Formal Case No. 383.” Order No. 3530 as hereinafter explained, has been supplanted by Order No. 3715.
This is the second time this cause has been before this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Yankee Network, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Sisto v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Fioret Sales Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Neff v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Leonard S. Goodman v. Public Service Commission of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- O'Kon v. RolandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Washington, Marlboro & Annapolis Motor Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission of District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982