Legal Opinion
Neff v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 8, 1941No. 4699PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, Circuit Judge.
This case comes before the court on a petition brought under § 5 (c) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended by the Act of March 21, 1938, 15 U.S.C.A. § 45, to review a cease and desist order of the Federal Trade Commission entered on July 16, 1940.
The petitioner, whose principal office is located at Miami, Oklahoma, is an individual doing business under the. trade name of the Prostex Company. He is engaged in selling and distributing in interstate commerce a medicinal preparation for internal use, known as Glantex. In an advertising campaign carried out by means…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cornec v. Baltimore & OR Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- Dr. W. B. Caldwell, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Justin Haynes & Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- General Commercial Co. v. Cosmopolitan Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Everts v. LatimerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Charles of the Ritz Distributors Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Maurice J. Feil and Leo a Loeb, Individually and as Co-Partners Trading as the Enurtone Company v. Federal Trande CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Carter Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Koch v. Federal Trade CommmissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Bristol-Myers Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.