Legal Opinion

Ross v. Hagen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1957No. 33798PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

LeRoy Ross and his wife purchased, in August, 1953, a five-acre tract of property adjoining that of Louis A. Hagen and wife. The Hagen property was subject to a recorded water easement for the benefit of the Ross property. The provisions of the easement required the Hagens to furnish a minimum of one-half inch of water from a well located on the Hagen property. The Rosses were to pay a monthly minimum charge for the water.

August 14, 1953, the Rosses commenced occupying the premises, and shortly thereafter the Hagens did not comply with the easement requirements. September 23, 1955, Le-Roy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Kirkpatrick v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Papac v. City of MontesanoWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Ward v. Painters' Local Union No. 300Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Sweet v. HowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alpine Industries, Inc. v. GohlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  2. Crown Controls, Inc. v. SmileyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  3. DeMaris v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. DeMaris v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API