Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Port of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1956No. 33739PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

The appellants are six of the named plaintiffs, H. O. Fitch, Kermit L. Harvey, Fannie Minshall, Daniel C. Hart, A. V. Holcomb, and Mark B. Walker. They appeal from a summary judgment entered against them in consolidated actions brought on the theory that their properties had been taken and damaged under color of the power of eminent domain without just compensation having been first made.

It was alleged in the complaints that the respondent port of Seattle, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the port), owns and operates an airport adjacent to the properties of the appellants;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stewart v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Boitano v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Harkoff v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Aliverti v. City of WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Messenger v. FryeWashington Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Highline School District No. 401 v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Miotke v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Port of Seattle v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Colella v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API