Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1955No. 33281PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, in an action in which he sought to recover an increased disability award.

Appellant assigns as error the court’s entry of the judgment, and its failure to enter judgment on the verdict.

The trial court, in granting the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, stated as its reason that, since the deposition of appellant’s medical witness was not contained in a sealed envelope, it was prejudicial error to permit the deposition to be published.

RCW 5.08.060 [cf. Rem. Rev. Stat., § 1243], which was in effect at the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seattle-Tacoma Shipbuilding Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Boyer v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Harper v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Rawlins v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. In Re the Estate of BodvinWashington Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Pannell v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. YAKIMA CEMENT PRODUCTS COMPANY v. Great American Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Page v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Stieneke v. RussiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Stieneke v. RussiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API