Legal Opinion
Shiang-Yueng Feng v. Dart Hill Realty, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 14, 1992No. 10000PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCretella, J.
The defendant1 appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs2 after a jury trial. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, where the verdict permitted a recovery for unjust enrichment in a relationship between the parties that was governed by express contract and was determined to be untainted by fraud or by a Connecti*382cut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA)3 violation. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to this appeal. On July 9,1988, the plaintiffs signed a written…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- L. F. Pace & Sons, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Vines v. Orchard Hills, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Pietrorazio v. SantopietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Pierce v. StaubSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- County Commissioners v. J. Roland Dashiell & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Polverari v. PeattConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Pleines v. Franklin Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Alliance Group Services, Inc. v. Grassi & Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Roraback v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.