Legal Opinion
Roraback v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 10, 1993No. 11914PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
The defendant Dolores P. Dworak appeals from the decision of the trial court sustaining the appeal of the plaintiff and reversing a decision of the defendant East Haddam planning and zoning commission (commission) which approved her application for site plan review. Dworak claims that the trial court improperly concluded that her application failed to meet the requirements of the applicable zoning regulations. We agree and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
Dworak applied to the East Haddam planning and zoning commission for site plan approval to build a single-family house on a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lawrence v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Forest Construction Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- RK Development Corp. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Town of Westport v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Kosinski v. LawlorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Berlin Batting Cages, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Maluccio v. E. Lyme Zoning Bd. of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Belcher v. Stafford Pzc, No. Cv 9558178s (Jun. 3, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Gelfman v. Plan. Zon. Comm., No. 31 94 30-31 95 87 (Jan. 12, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
- Golden Arch Ltd. v. Town Plan Zoning Com., No. Cv95325547 (Mar. 19, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.