Legal Opinion

Vidrine v. Fontenot

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1950No. 3311PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DORE, Judge.

This is a suit arising from a collision between plaintiff’s automobile and defendant’s automobile at the intersection of Vine Street- and Lombard Street in the City of Opelousas. The accident occurred at approximately 4:30 in the afternoon on August 5, 1948. Lombard Street is a paved street running north and south and under the.Opelousas ordinance, is a right of way street. Vine Street is also a paved street and runs east and west and where it intersects Lombard Street, there are stop signs indicating to travelers thereon that Lombard Street is a favored street. The automobile of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. LeeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Bethancourt v. BayhiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Simpson v. PardueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Brayman v. DewolfSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Guernsey v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Robbins v. MydlandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Nix v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. New Hampshire Fire Ins. Co. v. BushLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Ball v. Marquette Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Spencer v. CrainLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API