Legal Opinion
United States v. Edward Rosenthal, United States of America v. Edward Rosenthal
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 19, 2006No. 03-10307, 03-10370PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
The panel, with the following amendments, has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing filed by Edward Rosenthal and the Government; Judge Berzon voted to deny Rosenthal’s petition for rehearing en banc and Judges B. Fletcher and Gibson so recommend. The panel has granted the government all relief it requested, and it has granted in part the relief Rosenthal requested.
The opinion filed April 26, 2006, slip op. 4745, and published at 445 F.3d 1239 (9th Cir.2006) is hereby amended as follows:
1. Fifteenth line (first full paragraph)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rushen v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' CooperativeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Enrique Godoy v. Marion SpearmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Noah KleinmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Olympic Forest Coalition v. Coast Seafoods CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- White Mountain Health Center, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.