Legal Opinion

Cabaniss v. City of Huntsville

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 7, 1928No. 8 Div. 937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

Section 2190 of. the Code provides:

“When any improvement made under the provisions of this article [33] is contemplated [?], the mayor shall cause to be prepared a roll or list showing the names of the property owners, and opposite each name a description of each lot or parcel of land proposed to be assessed for such improvement, belonging to such owner or owners, and the amount proposed to be assessed against each lot or parcel of land.”

An examination of this statute as originally enrolled and as first published (Gen. A.cts 1907, § 10, p. 301) shows that the word “contemplated” was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Minge v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. City of Valdosta v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  3. Diggins v. HartshorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. East v. KarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Martin v. BainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Bessemer v. ClowdusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. City of Jasper v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Klepac v. FendleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Peoples v. State Security BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API