Legal Opinion

Texaus Investment Corp. v. Haendiges

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 26, 1985No. 84-3119PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

761 F.2d 252

53 USLW 2551

TEXAUS INVESTMENT CORP., N.V., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Roger M. HAENDIGES; Lee Haendiges; Hayes Corp.; The City

of Cleveland; Building Commissioner, City of

Cleveland; and Chief Building

Inspector, City of Cleveland,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 84-3119.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Feb. 14, 1985.

Decided April 26, 1985.

Morton Q. Levin (argued), Mark Ross Greenfield, Levin & Associates, Co., L.P.A., Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellant.

Janet Burney (argued), Michael F. Waiwood, Donald P. McFadden, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants-appellees.

Before LIVELY,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Reynolds v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Betty Adams, Joseph Adams v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Singleton v. City of HamiltonOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API