Legal Opinion

United States v. Conley

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1994No. Crim. 91-178PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEE, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant John F. “Duffy” Conley’s motion to suppress his statement at the Main Hotel on October 30, 1989. (Document No. 377, in part).

FINDINGS OF FACTS

The Encounter at the Windgap Facility

1. During the month of October, 1989, Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent John Donnelly (“S.A. Donnelly”) was in the midst of an investigation into organized crime and gambling devices.

2. Although there was an ongoing, independent federal investigation of John F. “Duffy” Conley (“Conley”), S.A. Donnelly was not aware of it. Conley was not a…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. SalemmeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  2. State v. UngaWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. United States v. Josette JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  4. State v. SpaethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. State v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API