Legal Opinion

Mackintosh-Hemphill Division, E. W. Bliss Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1965No. Appeal, No. 236PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

In this unemployment compensation case the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review awarded benefits to the claimants, employees of the appellant, Maekintosh-Hemphill Division, E. W. Bliss Company, on the ground that their unemployment was the result of a work stoppage for which the employer was primarily responsible under §402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(d).

The case involves benefits for a number of employees who had become unemployed as a result of a dispute concerning a new labor contract between the appellant and the union representative of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. American Ship Building Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Foley Bros., Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Hogan Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Penflex, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. JolliffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Nelan Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API