Mackintosh-Hemphill Division, E. W. Bliss Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Watkins, J.,
In this unemployment compensation case the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review awarded benefits to the claimants, employees of the appellant, Maekintosh-Hemphill Division, E. W. Bliss Company, on the ground that their unemployment was the result of a work stoppage for which the employer was primarily responsible under §402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(d).
The case involves benefits for a number of employees who had become unemployed as a result of a dispute concerning a new labor contract between the appellant and the union representative of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- American Ship Building Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Foley Bros., Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Hogan Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Penflex, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. JolliffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Nelan Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.