Legal Opinion

Herreid v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided May 9, 2003No. A-8341PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Walt Herreid was indicted for first-degree and second-degree sexual assault. He ultimately reached a plea bargain with the State; under the terms of this bargain, Herreid pleaded no contest to a single misdemeanor count-attempted third-degree sexual assault. 1

Even though Herreid was convicted of a misdemeanor, this misdemeanor is nevertheless classified as a "sex offense" for purposes of the Sex Offender Registration Act. 2 Accordingly, Herreid is required to register and to report annually for a period of 15-years. 3

In this appeal, Herreid contends that the Sex…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Peterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1999
  4. Whitehead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. John Doe v. James T. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. State v. LetalienSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  3. Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Boles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
  5. Schwab v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API