Legal Opinion
United States v. Kerik
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 23, 2008No. 07 Cr. 1027PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
STEPHEN C. ROBINSON, District Judge.
The Constitution of the United States ensures that criminal defendants have access to effective counsel. When that counsel is not or can not be effective, however, the court must balance the defendant’s interest against the court’s interest in preserving the integrity and ethical standards of the legal proceedings before it. In the instant case, it is impossible for this Court to see how Mr. Breen’s representation of the Defendant does not jeopardize both the Defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel and the court’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Frank Locascio, and John GottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chevron Corp. v. SalazarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Amusement Industry, Inc. v. SternDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Fortson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- United States v. KerikDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Schaeffler v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014