Legal Opinion
Employers Casualty Company v. Moyston
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided November 14, 1969No. 351PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
The jury verdict for plaintiff found defendant negligent in failing to give adequate notice that gas service to the property had been cut off. The trial court entered judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiff appeals. In deciding whether the judgment notwithstanding the verdict is proper, we consider whether there is “neither evidence nor inference” from which the jury could determine that defendant was negligent. Chavira v. Carpahan, 77 N.M. 467, 423 P.2d 988 (1967); Flanary v. Transport Trucking Stop, 78 N.M. 797, 438 P.2d 637 (Ct.App.1968).
Mrs. Welch…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Beal v. Southern Union Gas Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Chavira v. CarnahanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- White v. City of LovingtonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
- Flanary v. Transport Trucking StopNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- Washington Gas Light Company v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alice H. Rossin, for Herself and Others Similarly Situated v. Southern Union Gas Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Gough v. Famariss Oil and Refining CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Trigg v. Middle Tennessee Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
- Bitsie Ex Rel. Bitsie v. WalstonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- Bitsie Ex Rel. Bitsie v. WalstonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.