Legal Opinion
State v. Griffith
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from Finney District Court. Embezzlement. From a conviction and sentence, September 24, 1889, the defendant Griffith appeals. The facts are set forth in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
JOHNSTON, J.:
T. E. Griffith was convicted under § 90 of the crimes act of embezzling a certain inventory of household goods and furniture. The information on which he was convicted alleged that—
“On the 22d day of August, 1889, in Finney county and state of Kansas, one T. E. Griffith did then and there unlawfully and feloniously embezzle and convert to his own use, and did then and there unlawfully make way with and secrete, with intent to embezzle and convert to his own use, the following property of one Simpson W. Day, then and there being, which…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- State v. MimsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- People v. HillUtah Supreme Court · 1884
- State v. GrishamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- State v. CombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- State v. HoltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- State v. CocklinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- State v. WackerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.