Legal Opinion

State v. Combs

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1891PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Harvey District Court. Prosecution for embezzlement. From a conviction at the May term, 1891, the defendant, Combs, appeals. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

This was a prosecution for embezzlement, under § 90 of the crimes act. The defendant was convicted, and the judgment of the court was, that he should be confined at hard labor for a term of two years in the state penitentiary. The information under which he was convicted charged as follows:

“That on the 10th day of March, 1891, in said county of Harvey and state of Kansas, one A. M. Fearn did intrust to William Combs, for safe custody, $530, current money of the United States, of the value of $530, he, the said William Combs, receiving and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HenrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  2. City of Kingman v. BerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. State v. GriffithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Helser v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  2. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. State v. ChaplainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. State v. EllisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API