Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Rosenberg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1926No. 19419. En BancPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

This is an action instituted hy the respondents, David Rosenberg and Harry Rosenberg, against the executors of the estate of Samuel Rosenberg, deceased, to recover in damages on account of fraud, claimed to have been perpetrated upon them in a settlement had between them with respect to the property'of the-estate. The amount demanded was twenty thousand dollars, and for this sum the trial court, on a trial without a jury, awarded them a judgment. The executors appeal.

On October 1, 1916, Samuel Rosenberg died testate, leaving a considerable estate consisting of real and personal property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White v. MileyWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Hemrich v. HemrichWashington Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Schoeman v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hilton v. MumawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Gridley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  5. In re the Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API