Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Laudumiey

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 27, 2003No. 2003-B-0234PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS.

2Per curiam

This disciplinary matter involves consolidated charges instituted against respondents, Fernand L. Laudumiey, III and Dennis S. Mann, two attorneys who are licensed to practice law in Louisiana, but currently on interim suspension.

UNDERLYING FACTS

Factual Background

In 1996, respondents entered into an employment arrangement with Ernest Aia-volasiti and Michael Palmisano, two non-attorney “legal assistants” who had been previously employed by another law firm.1 Mr. Aiavolasiti and Mr. Palmisano indicated they had personal contact with their former firm’s clients…

3Cases cited28 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  3. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. BoutallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  5. State Ex Rel. Olivieri v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re O'KeefeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  2. In re EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  3. In RE McCLANAHANSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  4. In Re ShortessSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  5. In re ThomasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API