Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In RE McCLANAHAN

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 5, 2010No. 2009-B-1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM. *

| iThis disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Michael Wayne McClanahan, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana but currently on interim suspension pursuant to a joint motion of the parties filed in October 1997. In re: McClanahan, 97-2555 (La.11/5/97), 701 So.2d 959. The interim suspension followed respondent’s acknowledgment to the ODC that he was addicted to drugs and alcohol. Thereafter, respondent entered substance abuse treatment for his addiction and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. In Re BanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re DixonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  2. In Re DixonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  3. In re TurnageSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API