Legal Opinion
United States v. Posey
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 20, 1987No. CV 87-662-AAH, CR 77-578(A)-AAHPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CORRECT AN ILLEGAL SENTENCE PURSUANT TO RULE 35(A), FED.R.CRIM.P., AND MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
HAUK, Senior District Judge.
DECISION
Introduction
This matter is before the Court on the motions of pro per Defendant-Movant Joseph Posey (“Posey”) to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) and for a temporary restraining order. In order to give fuller meaning to the Court’s Decision and Order herein on these respective motions, it will be necessary to set forth the underlying factual and procedural history surrounding Posey’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Anthony Lee Chaney v. Samuel Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and Lloyd E. Bramlett, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Robert Anderson v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Michael Knaubert v. Goldsmith, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Paul H. Rauter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Patrick M. ReilleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jude Somerset HardestyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Jude Somerset HardestyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Jude Somerset HardestyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.