Legal Opinion

United States v. Jude Somerset Hardesty

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1992No. 90-30260Published

1Opinion of the Court

958 F.2d 910

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Jude Somerset HARDESTY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-30260.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted July 11, 1991.

Decided March 10, 1992.

Paul S. Petterson, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellant.

Baron C. Sheldahl, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.

Before ALARCON, FERGUSON and HALL, Circuit Judges.

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:

1

While serving a ten-year state prison term, defendant-appellant…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Atonio v. Wards Cove Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Tommy v. Greenhow v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API