Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 20, 2007No. SC 88426PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Judge.

Introduction

Must the state prove correct venue as an element of the offense — that is, that the alleged crime occurred in the county where the case is being initiated?

In this case, the victim of a rape seemed uncertain whether the crime occurred in St. Louis County or in the city of St. Louis. The case presents the Court an opportunity to clarify the law of venue in criminal cases. Venue is not “jurisdictional.” Venue is not an element of the offense. An objection to venue must be presented, and ruled on, prior to trial.

Any error in handling the question of venue in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. LingarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. State v. CarsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. State v. ErwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  5. State Ex Rel. DePaul Health Center v. MummertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  2. State v. GainesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State v. RoggenbuckSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  4. State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  5. State v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API