Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. DePaul Health Center v. Mummert

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 22, 1994No. 76270PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

This original action in mandamus is another in a seemingly unending series of extraordinary -writ actions in which civil tort plaintiffs and defendants enter protracted procedural plotting to embrace or avoid the generous juries of the City of St. Louis. Our jurisdiction is founded on Article V, Section 4 of the Missouri Constitution.

In this case we consider whether the 1989 amendment to Sections 506.110, RSMo Cum.Supp.1998, and adoption of Section 476.-410, RSMo Cum.Supp.1993, overrule a long line of Missouri case law culminating in Oney v. Pattison, 747 S.W.2d 187 (Mo. banc…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Boll v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. State Ex Rel. Elson v. KoehrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Mid-America v. GaertnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Minihan v. AronsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Sullenger v. Cooke Sales & Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Linthicum v. CalvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  3. Lynch v. Blanke Baer & Bowey Krimko, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Bellon Wrecking & Salvage Co. v. David Orf, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State Ex Rel. Malone v. MummertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API