State v. Holmes
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
LAURA DENVIR STITH, Judge.
Joseph N. Holmes appeals his conviction for misdemeanor criminal nonsupport. He argues the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal claiming section 568.040, RSMo. Supp.2011, is unconstitutional because it makes lack of good cause an element of the crime of criminal nonsupport but then shifts the burden of proving good cause to the defendant, thereby violating his due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by forcing him to disprove an element of the offense.
Mr. Holmes misconstrues section 568.040.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Watts ex rel. Watts v. Lester E. Cox Medical CentersSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Stanhope v. PrattSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- State v. LATALLSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State of Missouri v. Luis Zetina-TorresSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
- State of Missouri v. Christopher C. ClaycombSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
- State of Missouri v. Thomas A. EssSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
- State v. NaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
- State v. VickersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.