Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Lowensohn
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 1976No. Civ. 45464PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHENS, Acting P. J.
This appeal is taken from a judgment in an eminent domain action brought by respondent, the City of Los Angeles. The action was initiated for the purpose of condemning 80 acres of land in the Palmdale area for airport purposes. The property was owned by appellants, Dr. and Mrs. Lowensohn, who were awarded $440,000 by the jury as compensation for their land. Appellants moved for a new trial; this motion was denied.
Facts
In 1962 appellants purchased the subject property for investment purposes. From the time of the purchase to the time of the eminent domain…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Garden Grove School District v. HendlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Stone v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
- San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Jones v. People Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Redevelopment Agency v. Contra Costa Theatre, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Orpheum Building Co. v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.